Most SEOs contemplate Google Search Console (GSC) their supply of fact and belief the info to be correct. What if I instructed you that GSC doesn’t let you know the entire key phrases you’re getting visitors from? In actual fact, the device doesn’t present a time period for almost half the clicks.
These situations of hidden phrases account for 46.08% of all clicks in our examine. The examine consists of one month of knowledge throughout 146,741 web sites and almost 9 billion whole clicks.
Let’s dive in.
First, I need to give an enormous due to Mauricio Fernandez from our backend staff for serving to me pull this knowledge.
It is a scatter plot the place every dot represents one of many 146,741 web sites. It exhibits the share of clicks that’s lacking and the general web site visitors.

As you may see, some websites don’t have any phrases with clicks related and others have all of their knowledge. Each web site is totally different, and the quantity of lacking knowledge varies throughout the dataset.
There are a few factors right here I need to speak about due to their significance. There’s a web site (1) with 100 million clicks the place 90.3% of the info is lacking. There’s one other web site (2) with 63 million clicks which are lacking phrases for less than 2.27% of their clicks. As you may see, the info varies a lot!

One other option to present how a lot the lacking click on knowledge varies is to have a look at the distribution of how a lot knowledge is lacking throughout the dataset. There are many websites in each single bucket. You’ll have a troublesome time guessing how a lot knowledge is lacking from anyone web site.

You see plenty of websites across the center and a big spike at 95%-100% lacking clicks. So lots of the websites are lacking about half their knowledge, however a lot of websites are lacking many of the knowledge.
What I feel could also be fascinating is to bucket the websites by the visitors they obtain. Within the field plot under, you’ll see that each low-traffic and high-traffic websites are usually lacking extra of the info. Websites within the center buckets are likely to have much less lacking knowledge.

The info typically will get higher with extra visitors. However after 10 million or so clicks, the info begins to get significantly worse.
In case you’re seeing field plots for the primary time, right here’s how it’s best to learn them:

The small traces on the perimeters characterize the minimal and most values. And 50% of all values fall within the highlighted areas. The road in that space is the median worth.
At this level, you might suppose we’ve made a mistake with the info. That we totaled up solely the 1,000 rows proven within the GSC interface which are exportable to get the info, and that’s why a lot is lacking.
However that’s not the case. We pulled this knowledge through the API, which permits us to get the entire knowledge—and there’s nonetheless rather a lot lacking!
I do know everybody’s important concern goes to be how a lot knowledge is lacking from their very own web site, so I need to give you a option to examine this. The best option to see what number of clicks go to phrases Google doesn’t present you is to make use of the GSC connector in Google Knowledge Studio.
I made a Knowledge Studio report you could copy to examine the lacking knowledge in your personal web site. This makes use of knowledge for the final 12 months. About half the info is lacking for my private web site on the time of writing.

Make your personal copy of the report and add your GSC knowledge as a supply. Right here’s how:
- Within the prime proper, click on the three dots after which click on “Make a copy.”
- Within the dropdown for “New Knowledge Supply,” choose the GSC knowledge supply for the location you’re serious about.
- If the location isn’t accessible, choose “Create knowledge supply.” Seek for “Search Console” and click on it.
- Click on the GSC property you need to use > click on “Website Impression” > click on “Internet.” Then within the upper-right nook, click on “Join.”
- Within the upper-right nook, click on “Add To Report.”
- Click on “Copy Report.”
I’d love some self-reported person knowledge for this. If you wish to share, tweet your “Grand whole” numbers from #1 and #2 to @patrickstox and @ahrefs. Or simply PM me on Twitter, and I’ll mixture the self-reported knowledge to share right here at a later date. I think many of the user-reported knowledge corroborates with the info from the examine that exhibits the quantity lacking varies throughout websites.
Google offers a couple of causes for this discrepancy:
To guard person privateness, the Efficiency report doesn’t present all knowledge. For instance, we’d not observe some queries which are made a really small variety of occasions or those who comprise private or delicate info.
I don’t consider for a second that just about half of the searches to all of those websites had been non-public. That leaves the rationale that among the queries are being made a small variety of occasions—usually referred to as long-tail key phrases. Google might have understated that only a bit. At any price, 46.08% lacking is approach increased than I anticipated.
We all know that 15% of all Google searches have never been seen before. I’m certain Google shops these queries. In any other case, it gained’t be capable to provide you with that statistic.
Nevertheless, I’d speculate that the staff behind GSC has restricted assets, and it doesn’t trouble to retailer or expose the entire knowledge. It’s simply the extent of the info that’s lacking is shocking to me and will come as a shock to you.
Closing ideas
You’ll be able to determine the sorts of phrases that drive visitors to a web page by utilizing the Efficiency report in GSC or by checking the Natural key phrases report in Ahrefs’ Website Explorer. The hidden knowledge in GSC possible consists of phrases which are just like the phrases listed right here.
For instance, Google is lacking knowledge on 35% of the clicks for our put up on key phrase analysis. Within the U.S., there are 327 phrases listed in GSC and 426 in Ahrefs.

In all, 178 of those are duplicated within the datasets, however that leaves quite a lot of distinctive phrases in every dataset. Whereas we will’t say for certain what the lacking phrases are, they’re possible just like the phrases included in these experiences.
Message me on Twitter if in case you have any questions.